The purpose of this blog is to organize and reorganize resources and my own work on the biology of Millepora spp. and their zooxanthellae.

Wednesday, February 28, 2024

Briefly: A note from the Coral List about Millepora spp. decline in the Red Sea

On a mailing list a recent post to a discussion thread about effects of warming on coral reefs included this remark:

 

... There was a massive coral bleaching south of latitude 20 degrees (Al Lith) during the 2023 summer, correlating with water temperatures of 33-34 degrees. Many of the bleached corals have subsequently died and there has also been a near-complete loss of Millepora hydrozoans.

 

I had lunch next to Zvi Dubinsky, at the International Coral Reef Symposium on Guam, in 1992.  I discussed my interest in Millepora spp.  He said: "Millepora is always the first to go."

 

 


 




Note about Millepora taxonomy

 History of the taxonomy of Genus Millepora is tortured.   In the mid-20th Century, work by Hulbrandt Boschma resulted in the separation of the Genus into a number of species that are, substantially, still recognized today.  Hickson had synonymized all species of Millepora as ecomorphs of M. alcicornis. 

 In 1898, Hickson decided that the variations in morphology were due to environmental factors and that Millepora alcicornis was the valid name for all these species. This conclusion has since been questioned.

                                          ---Wikipedia

A number of workers have recently applied molecular methods to the classification of Millepora spp., and to be sure some question has been cast on the global homogeneity of, for example, Millepora platyphylla and especially M. dichotoma.  

Sidney Hickson was a  widely recognized zoological authority.  A lesson can be drawn by looking at the number of workers---themselves also authorities---who accepted the word of Hickson without, it seems, questioning the validity of a remarkable act of mass synonymization of a suite of species as ecomorphs of a single species.    Hickson could do no wrong.  


The species question of corals in general is a thorny one.  Even the definition of species needs to be examined, when discussing corals.  The fact of mass spawning of numerous species of corals at various places, including the Great Barrier Reef, and Guam, for example, would seem to leave open the possibility, in my mind, of hybridization. 

In his treatment of _The Species Problem in Millepora,  Boschma he discussed  characters that could distinguish various Millepora species, citing Hickson's earlier list:


  • The form of the corallum
  • The texture of the corallum and its surface
  • The size of the pores
  • The shape of the pores
  • The degree of isolation of the cycles
  • The relative number of Dactylopores and Gastropores
  • The distribution of the pores in various parts of the corallum
  • The Presence or absence of ampullae
  • The anatomy of the soft parts
  • The stinging properties
  • The distribution of the various forms in different parts of the reefs
 

 In one paper, Duchassiang and Michelotti (in 1864) named "not less than 22 (or 24) West Indian species."  (Boschma,  Very few have not tripped over the thorny problem of the species of Millepora.  

 

To be extended.  Boschma's paper is noteworthy.  

 Boschma, Hilbrand. "The species problem in Millepora." Zoologische Verhandelingen 1, no. 1 (1948): 1-116.

Randomly, here is a reference to Arigoni et al, a recent approach to systematics of Millepora spp.

 Arrigoni, Roberto ; Maggioni, Davide ; Montano, Simone et al. / An integrated morpho-molecular approach to delineate species boundaries of Millepora from the Red Sea. In: Coral Reefs. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 4. pp. 967-984.

 Boisson et al. approached the species of Millepora at Reunion in a similar manner:

Boissin, E., J. K. L. Leung, V. Denis, Chloé A-F. Bourmaud, and Nicole Gravier-Bonnet. "Morpho-molecular delineation of structurally important reef species, the fire corals, Millepora spp., at Réunion Island, Southwestern Indian Ocean." Hydrobiologia 847, no. 5 (2020): 1237-1255.
 

 Another parallel:

Manchenko, Gennady P., Alexander V. Moschenko, and Vyatcheslav S. Odintsov. "Biochemical genetics and systematics of Millepora (Coelenterata: Hydrozoa) from the shore of south Vietnam." Biochemical systematics and ecology 21, no. 6-7 (1993): 729-735.

 

 

 

 



 



Friday, February 2, 2024

A lost slide found: Some thoughts: Putative Dying Dinoflagellaes; and Overview Images of Zooid Distribution

 As I was cleaning out my drawers, a slide appeared, caked in grime, that I had carefully labelled at some point using a crow quill pen wit, waterproof drawing ink, coated with clear nail polish.  The label provides the following information:  

Slide    : 530 ["A"]

Colony: Tog BE

Date.    : 15 April 1986

                    Fixative:  Bouin's 

                    Stain.    : #2 = Hematoxylin and Eosin

  

Green Cells: Putative dying Dinoflagellates, and date Medusae were Liberated

This slide is particularly interesting because of the date, and the presence of clusters of green entities that are probably deteriorating dinoflagellate symbionts.  Full Moon that month was on March 26 (need to double check this).   Medusae would have been liberated between 2 and 5 days after Full Moon.  This specimen may have been taken 20 days after Full Moon.  





Why are these clusters interesting?  Seeing the date, I have at least one new hypothesis to test:

 Since this date is 20 after full moon and the liberation of medusa was two to five days after Full Moon, does this suggest that after liberation, the entire colony reorganizes itself, the symbionts in certain regions being killed off?

I will revisit this idea at another time.

 Overviews of zooid distribution: a cyclosystem and random dactylozoids.


Two images are presented here of the same area of the slide mentioned above.  Actually, the date is inconsequential, as I was merely aiming for an, if one will, aerial overview of a small region, including a single Gastrozoid and its associates, the Dactylozoids, arranges in a Cyclosystem, .  The first is a single  brightfield image taken through a 4X AmScope objective; the second image is a 4x4 panorama assembled through Helicon Focus, software I have also used to take focus stacks of especially Millepora spp. skeletal material.  

Image I: A single brightfield image, 4X.  

I have not yet inserted a scale bar.





Image II: Darkfield panorama of 16 images taken at a higher magnification.

Panorama built up from 16 (4x4) images.  16X Objective.   
 

Friday, January 5, 2024

Two Compelling Features Observed in ~1.2X Macro Images of a Skeletal Fragment of Millepora platyphylla

The specimen

A  small number of skeletal fragments are available to me from my collection of Millepora spp. on Guam between 1984 and 1986.  As I have come to examine these specimens more closely, through macro and ultra-macro photography, many interesting features have been revealed.   

I had read of a method, referred to in one paper (that I have lost track of) as Koch's Method, used early in the history of study of Millepora spp., wherein a preserved coral together with its skeleton were ground down to a thin section, that revealed the nature of the relationship of the coral animal with it's stony exoskeleton.  Why not, I thought, grind a broken edge of a fragment with fine stone, file,  or sandpaper?  With that in mind, I picked up a piece and started filing with a cheap diamond jewelers file. and various grits of sandpaper along one promising edge.   

This particular fragment of, I think, Millepora  platyphylla bore pencil markings (as I used to write upon them before cleaning), with the date and site of collection: Obyan Beach, Saipan, on 8 June 2001.  Upon further examination of this piece, it occurred to me a macro study might be revealing.  Using a Canon EOS EF-M 28mm f/3.5 macro lens I photographed this piece at the maximum magnification of 1.2X.  on a Canon EOS M50 camera, by built-in flash. The following features were observed, providing surprising insights into the morphology of the skeleton, and the organization of the animal.   These are presented in two images.  As it appears, this piece seems to have  been collected at a time of especially intense  Calcium Carbonate production.  So far, two special features have attracted my attention.  Here are presented images of them.


A line of pores of identical diameter along a ridge



Ordinarily, the surface of Millepora platyphylla exhibits tightly packed cyclosystems, wherein larger gastropores are encircled by dactylopores in various arrangements referred to by Hulbrandt Boschma determined to be species specific.  In this case,  the variation in diameter of the pores in this row.  Also, smaller pores appear, at first glance, to flank them along the sides of the ridge; further study is also planned at higher magnifications to measure and compare the diameters of these pores for uniformity, and determine whether they are similar in size to gastropores in cyclosystems---which may be observed, however blurry, elsewhere in this image.  Not so obvious are parallel lines along either side of this row, of apparently smaller diameter.  If these two sets of pores are indeed related in size to gastrozoids and dactylozoids, a very interesting parallel is suggested with the sylasterid hydrocoral Distichopora spp, a group of hydrozoans closely related to the Milleporidae, the family of Millepora spp.  

Puce et al. have published a study of the development of the arrangement of rows of pores along the branch tips of Distochopora sp. from a cyclosystem.  It would be incredible if something like that is going on here. 

Puce, S., Pica, D., Brun, F., Mancini, L., & Bavestrello, G. (2012). Genus Distichopora (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa): from primary cyclosystem to adult pore organisation. Coral Reefs, 31(3), 715–730. doi:10.1007/s00338-012-0885-0 

I have taken the liberty to copy an image of this character of Distichopora from their paper:


This seeming parallel may be a stretch of the imagination; but even the slightest similarities of these systems are especially interesting, given their close evolutionary relationship. 


A lattice pattern of new growth  

 In the following image, taken from another area of the same fragment, illustrates a striking latticework of blank areas, like pathways, devoid of pores.  These appear to surround and delineate cyclosystems.  Boschma had much to say about the details of cyclosystems of Millepora spp.: he, in fact, utilized differences of the pattern of pores in cyclosystems as characters to delineate and redefine species that had been lumped as a single species by Hickson half a century earlier.

A flush of new skeletal production is suggested, as within these broad and pale pathways may be observed smaller pores that have been obscured by overgrowth.



The two features illustrated here are suggestive.  They seem to point to a time of intense calcification, following Full Moon in June.  How does this fit the overall pattern of reproductive periodicity of Millepora spp. on Guam?


Sunday, December 17, 2023

Darkfield Images of tangential sections, showing connectivity within cyclosystems.

 



A Gastrozoid showing four club tentacles.


Macro study of the skeletal material, ongoing. Tabulae.

Other closeups of Skeletal Material


Images of ampullae are found in a previous post.
Earlier images of tabulae and coenosteum are found in a previous post, here.

Tubes: fossil houses of polyps, with tabulae:


Fragment of Millepora platyphylla, with fracture exposed.


A compelling  description of formation of tabulae in Millepora is found in Kaestner's  Invertebrate Zoology:

The polyps stand in little pits into which they can contract. In many species, five to eight defensive zooids form a circle, 0.25 mm in diameter, around a feeding zooid. New growth slowly thickens the crust while the lower layers die. As the polyps grow outward within their tubes, their aboral surfaces produce a new calcareous layer.


Focus stack of fracture, showing tabulae.






General appearance of surface, with irregular cyclosystems:

Kaestner again:

The polyps stand in little pits into which they can contract. In many species, five to eight defensive zooids form a circle, 0.25 mm in diameter, around a feeding zooid.




Entry of Zooxanthellae into the Ovum of Millepora spp. and Skeletal events at liberation

Methods and concepts:  

cursory description


I began collecting fragments of Millepora spp. in August, 1984, with the intention of eventual statistical analysis of the times of reproductive activity.  Observation of a liberation event of medusoids, on an evening in early April, 1985, removed any question of synchronous spawning: study of Millepora platyphylla turned a corner.  I would collect and preserve tissue specimens to pair with the hard parts fragments, to ferret out the sequence of events---development of medusae and gametes, opening of ampullae, and liberation of medusae.   At that point, it became. feasible to focus collection within certain meaningful time frames.  

The Moon that night was 4 or 5 days past Full.  I had reason to believe that this was a synchronized event; if this was the case, it would be useful to focus future collection effort on the days leading up to this night of the Moon.  A question remained: was this a synchronous event among populations on Guam?  Immediately on the next morning, I made forays on other accessible reefs, all on the Western Coast of Guam.  Other colonies demonstrating similar appearance were observed elsewhere, suggesting that this was a synchronous event on a scale greater than a single reef.   

Since I had been focusing my attention on this single species complex, I recalled that a few days prior to this liberation event, an unusual spectacle was observed among a number of colonies at Gun Beach (Fafai), North of Tumon Bay.  Some proportion of colonies had turned a darker brown color; and tiny white rings--less than 1mm in diameter---had appeared, densely scattered irregularly on various parts of colonies.  The stark white of the rings presented a very pleasing contrast against  the dark backgrounds of these colonies.  I suspected the darker colored colonies might betray proliferation of symbiotic dinoflagellates (probably Symbiodinium sp., here called zooxanthellae), or an increase of photosynthetic pigments.   

Since Millepora spp. are widely reported to exhibit vertical transmission of symbionts---ova being imbued with zooxanthellae before their fertilization---proliferation of zooxanthellae might actually be required to generate a supply sufficient for infection of the egg.  Remarkably, as of this writing, 37 years later, I have neither met nor heard of anyone else who has observed this remarkable event.  This points to the importance of focusing field studies on a single species (pointed out by George Barlow as a watchword of the biologist Karl Roehder).  It is one of the most remarkable exhibitions I have ever witnessed.

At this point, due to a previous interest in gametogenesis, field collection took on a new aspect.  Follows a cursory description of field and laboratory treatment of specimens.

  • Fragments of Millepora platyphylla (and sometimes M. dichotoma) were broken off from identified colonies with a masonry hammer, and immediately collected into zip loc bags with a good quantity of sea water.  Each specimen---or perhaps specimens from the same colony---was isolated in its own bag.   Each specimen was marked in graphite pencil with date and place of collection.
  • On the beach, or perhaps in the laboratory, part of each specimen was fixed in one of various solutions, and matching part was immersed in a tank of Calcium Hypochlorite (swimming pool chlorine) for a few days.  
  • Fixation: some specimens were fixed in an acidic fixative, like Bouin's, or Formaldehyde with Formic Acid and other solutions.  After a few days, others were immersed in various decalcifying solutions.  
  • The tissue of Millepora spp. comprises as thin sheet, <=1mm thick, that lifts off of the CaCO3 skeleton in the dish during decalcification.  These sheets were cut with scissors into smaller sheets that could be handled, for dehydration and embedment in paraffin wax.  
  • Some blocks were sectioned on a rotary microtome and slides prepared. 
  • Casson Trichrome was relied upon for staining, for the most part.  
I left Guam and moved to Chuuk, in late 1996.  I did not have a microscope, but had a number of the the slides I had prepared on Guam.  These slides mysteriously disappeared from my classroom at Chuuk High School, a year or two later.  

Thanks to a friend, my remaining blocks and some of the matching skeletal material was recovered some years later, and brought to Saipan.  I have observed and collected a few skeletal fragments on Saipan, between 1999 and 2001.  A spring timing similar to that on Guam, and similar lunar synchrony seemed to be indicated by these sparse observations.  I did not have the wherewithall to preserve tissue specimens during those years. 

Thanks to the interest of coral pathologist Esther Peters, a number of blocks were sectioned, slides produced and stained, which I am still studying some 20 years later.

In Berkeley, a opportunity arose to section about 4 blocks, out of the nearly 200 that remain.  Out of the kindness of a laboratory manager, slides were then stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin.  I had almost randomly selected blocks to section, based on my hunch that darker tissues represented darker colonies that could be endowed with medusae in a state of near readiness for exodus from their home colonies, and spawning.   The results of this   selection seem to support the supposition that darker colonies are reproductively active: at least three blocks yielded sections displaying medusoids.  
 
I hypothesize that reproduction is seasonal on Guam, that the first reproductive event  happens in late March or early April, and that medusoids are released 3 to 5 days after Full Moon (with some exceptions), just after Sunset.   This evening is the first of the lunar cycle when a short period of full darkness happens after the setting of the sun, before the rising of the Moon.  This mode of reproductive timing seems common among marine animals.


 Induction of Zooxanthellae into the Ovum

Here are presented   images  from the ongoing study of existing slides, portraying stages in the approach and incorporation of zooxanthellae into the egg.


Cluster of Zooxanthellae in Immature Medusoid


Above, within a medusoid---apparently flattened during sectioning---zooxanthellae are dividing.  One possibility seems to be that zooxanthellae proliferate during the events leading up to and during the process of entering the medusoid and ovum.


Early movement of zooxanthellae toward developing ova

Phase contrast image.   Note zooxanthellae crossing the field of lipid droplets. Calicoblasts, yellow.

Among the presumptive ova, only three in each medusa, develop into mature eggs.  As seen below, other cuboidal cells provide nutritional support for the growing ovum.  These are termed here "nurse cells.


Zooxanthellae are nestling up to the Ovum and Nurse Cells.

In the above image, the larger cell at the bottom is one of the row of rectangular cells that are potential ova, but are here called nurse cells, because they nurture the successful ovum,  coalescing with it.  The nuclei of the nurse cells are not as distinctive as the large nucleus of the ovum.  Small zooxanthellae are embedded in the matrix of Lipid Droplets, and are apparently approaching the egg.  They are not yet incorporated.  The definition of "ovum" seems unclear: are the lipid droplets part of the ovum, or not?


Zooxanthellae swarming and dividing


Ovum, late stage, with zooxanthellae, invading.  Many zoox are dividing.

 

The above image is a brightfield focus stack (with a 40X objective; scale to follow) showing a medusa well along in maturity.  At top and bottom are nuclei of nurse cells; the nucleus of the ovum is distinctive, and larger.  Zooxanthellae at the bottom left, outside the medusa, are not as actively dividing.  

Below, the same subject is shown in Phase Contrast.  




Phase Contrast, Focus stack by Helicon Focus



Opening up of Ampullae

Medusoids---medusae that are incompletely developed---develop within closed pits, the ampullae.  In order for the medusoid to escape, the covering of an ampulla must give way, or (thought it seems unlikely) be broken open by a flailing medusoid.  In the first image below, several ampullae appear to be fully open. 




The following image presents a conundrum, in that one ampulla still retains its covering, while an open one is seen farther to the right.  This begs the question whether a subsequent release may happen.  I have not made sufficiently detailed inquiries to determine whether medusoids may be released over more than one day in, as I presume, a monthly event.  This specimen has been cleaned in












Above, the encircled ampulla is intact, possibly slightly eroded in center.  The depressed condition was identified by Boschma as a diagnostic character for Millepora platyphylla.  On the right, the ampulla is open.  Smallest pores are dactylopores; they are arranged in a "cyclosystem" around the somewhat larger gastrozoids.  Boschma also noted that M. platyphylla cyclosystems are irregular, not neat encirclements as in at least some other species.