I was mainly interested in Neurobiology, particularly, perhaps, Neuroethology. However, realizing I would be studying in Guam, where neither the laboratory essentials nor the expertise would be available to support such studies, I spent a good amount of time and energy during my final year at UCSB boning up on Neurosecretion. The techniques were simple enough that a good microscope lab would support it. And as far as I had found out, noone had discovered neurosecretion in control of gametogenesis of clams. What, I thought, if I could apply the microscopic techniques of Gabe to the giant clam?
On Guam, I immediately realized there would not be enough giant clams to support this kind of study. (In retrospect I ought perhaps to have looked at other bivalves). Within a few days, in conversation with Dick Randall---whom I prevailed upon to be my research advisor over the next two years---it became apparent that Millepora spp. have an important advantage for studies of the study of reproductive periodicity. They possess permanent markers of reproductive physiological state in their skeleta: the ampullae. As I related elsewhere, I began immediately to collect them.
Suffice it to say that in order to whet my curiosity about Gabe's microscopic techniques for study of neurosecretion: Chrome haematoxylin and phloxine---I experimented with this, and numerous other techniques. I also attempted silver impregnation---though I must say with little or no success.
My pragmatic nature impelled me to not put very many of my eggs in this basket: it was just a side interest as far as Millepora spp. were concerned.
------------------------
I began, at any event, with inadequate prior preparation, to embed my M. platyphylla tissues in paraffin wax. I applied dozens of techniques, with little or no prior concept or direction. Even my microscope skills were wanting. A Nikon photomicroscope stand in the lab seemed to have succumbed some time ago to fungi, although my untrained eye would not, regretably, know the difference. I spent quite a lot of time studying sections, fixed and stained in broad range of materials, but with little conception, either of how bad the sections were, or of how to interpret them.
Some vague ideas or findings:
@article{JOSEPHMANGAN07011909,
author = {MANGAN, JOSEPH},
title = {{The Entry of Zooxanthellae into the Ovum of Millepora, and Some Particulars concerning the Medusae}},
journal = {Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science},
volume = {s2-53},
number = {212},
pages = {697-710},
year = {1909},
URL = {http://jcs.biologists.org},
eprint = {http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/s2-53/212/697.pdf}
}
Some vague ideas or findings:
- I suspect that Millepora dichotoma increases its production of nematocysts during reproductive activity. Stings at that time seemed particularly painful. I attempted to develop a water soluble mountant that would enable the rapid mounting of decalicified tissue pieces, with stains incorporated into them that would enable the rapid counting of nematocyts in situ, on the tissue. One or two stains seemed to bind preferentially to nematocysts, but the water soluble mountants made a mess of the whole thing, and the stains rapidly were leeched from those tissues.
- Early on, perhaps the first time I collected medusae, Professor L. G. Eldredge---my supervising advisor at the time---corroborated the observation that the medusae do have a velum. Mayer's early, encyclopedic work on the Medusae of the World (need reference) separated the "Medusae milleporinae" from all other hydromedusae on the basis of lack of a velum. The lack of a velum was one of the observations made by Sidney Hickson (reference). It might be added that Hickson's illustration of the medusa was incorporated into textbooks for many decades, until they were finally observed by myself and John Lewis, who illustrated one for one of his papers (need reference). Mangan published an important paper on medusae, using, I think, Hickson's material. The link to a pdf online is here. And here is the citation in BiBTeX format:
@article{JOSEPHMANGAN07011909,
author = {MANGAN, JOSEPH},
title = {{The Entry of Zooxanthellae into the Ovum of Millepora, and Some Particulars concerning the Medusae}},
journal = {Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science},
volume = {s2-53},
number = {212},
pages = {697-710},
year = {1909},
URL = {http://jcs.biologists.org},
eprint = {http://jcs.biologists.org/cgi/reprint/s2-53/212/697.pdf}
}
- Mangan's paper also delved into the problem of infection of the egg by zooxanthellae. Or should I say capture and packing of the zooxanthellae into the egg by the animal? Or perhaps the felicitous marriage of the two? The most striking finding of my study was that of activity of the zooxanthellae at the time of gametogenesis of the egg, and what looked to be a correlation of this activity with the induction of the zooxanthellae into the egg. (Or should I say ... ? Or what?). A topic for another chapter.